Go to homepage
Artigence logo
Recommend

Your Agency-Built Website Isn't Working. Here's What Went Wrong.

You paid a professional agency for a website. It looked good in the handover meeting. But leads aren't coming, conversions are flat, and something feels off. You're not imagining it.

Travis Sansome
8 min read
Your Agency-Built Website Isn't Working. Here's What Went Wrong.

You did everything right. You hired a professional agency—not your nephew, not a cheap freelancer from overseas, a real agency with a portfolio and references.

They delivered a website that looked good in the handover meeting. The design was polished. The photos were professional. Everyone agreed it was a significant upgrade.

Except it's not working.

Traffic is underwhelming. Leads have dried up or never materialised. Your competitor's website is closing deals you should be winning. Something's off, but you can't pinpoint what.

You're not imagining it. Many agency-built websites fail to deliver—not because agencies are incompetent, but because the engagement was structured in ways that guaranteed mediocrity.

Why "Professional" Websites Fail

The problem usually isn't execution. It's what came before.

Design without strategy

Many agencies are design-first. They create beautiful layouts, modern typography, and smooth animations. What they don't do is ask hard questions:

  • What specific actions should visitors take?
  • Who are these visitors, and what do they need to believe before acting?
  • What objections will they have, and how do we address them?
  • How does this page fit into the actual buying journey?

A website can be visually stunning and strategically useless. Pretty doesn't convert. Persuasion converts.

Template thinking

Agencies serving many clients develop efficient processes. Efficiency often means templates:

  • Same page structure for every client
  • Same section types in the same order
  • Same calls-to-action with different words
  • Same "About Us" format regardless of what makes you different

Templates aren't inherently bad. But a website that looks like every other website in your category doesn't differentiate you. You have three seconds to prove you're legit. Templates waste those seconds.

Content as afterthought

The most common website failure point: content.

Agencies quote for design and development. Content is often:

  • "Client to provide" (you'll figure it out)
  • Placeholder text that never gets replaced properly
  • Copywriting by the designer (who isn't a copywriter)
  • Your old website's content dropped into new templates

Bad content in a good design is like a sports car with a lawnmower engine. It looks fast, but it doesn't perform.

SEO as checkbox

"SEO-optimised" often means:

  • Meta titles and descriptions filled in
  • Alt tags on images
  • Mobile-responsive design
  • Maybe some basic page speed work

That's table stakes, not optimisation. Real SEO requires:

  • Keyword research driving content strategy
  • Content that answers what people actually search for
  • Technical foundations that support discoverability
  • Ongoing effort, not a one-time checkbox

Many agency-built sites are technically capable of ranking but contain nothing worth ranking for.

No conversion focus

Agencies measure success by project completion: Did we deliver what was scoped?

Business success is different: Does the website generate leads and sales?

Without conversion focus, you get websites that:

  • Have no clear calls-to-action
  • Bury contact information
  • Tell your story but don't prompt action
  • Look like brochures instead of sales tools

Wrong technology choices

Sometimes agencies recommend platforms that suit their workflow, not your needs:

  • WordPress when you need something simpler
  • Custom builds when a template would suffice
  • Platforms they know, not platforms that fit
  • Complexity that requires ongoing agency dependence

Technology choices made for agency convenience become your maintenance burden.

Signs Your Agency Website Failed

How do you know if your website is actually underperforming, versus just needing time to work?

Traffic indicators

  • Organic traffic flat or declining after launch honeymoon
  • Bounce rate higher than industry benchmarks (visitors leaving immediately)
  • Time on site lower than before the new design
  • Pages per session declining (visitors not exploring)

Conversion indicators

  • Fewer enquiries than your old website generated
  • Lower quality leads who aren't ready to buy
  • High cart abandonment (for e-commerce)
  • Nobody using the contact form you prominently placed

Qualitative indicators

  • Prospects mention finding you through competitors
  • Customers say the website didn't influence their decision
  • Your team hesitates to share the site
  • You're already thinking about the next redesign

Comparison indicators

  • Competitors with "worse" websites outrank you
  • Similar businesses in other cities appear in searches you should own
  • Your DIY-looking competitor is somehow getting more leads

What Actually Went Wrong

Usually, it's a combination of structural issues:

The brief was wrong

Agencies build what you ask for. If you asked for a "modern, professional website" without defining what that means for your business, you got... a modern, professional website. That doesn't convert.

The brief should have specified:

  • Target conversion actions and rates
  • Key messages and value propositions
  • Competitive differentiation requirements
  • SEO objectives and target keywords
  • Content strategy and ownership

Without these, agencies guess. Guesses are often wrong.

Nobody owned content

Website content is hard. It requires:

  • Understanding your business deeply
  • Writing persuasively for specific audiences
  • Structuring information for web reading patterns
  • Optimising for search without sacrificing readability

When content is "client to provide," it usually means:

  • Last-minute rush to fill pages
  • Copy-paste from old materials
  • Minimal editing or strategy
  • Pages that exist but don't work

Handover was handoff

Many agency relationships end at launch:

  • Here's your website
  • Here's the login
  • Here's a quick training session
  • Call us if you need changes (billable)

Without ongoing analysis and iteration, websites stagnate. Launch is the beginning, not the end.

Success wasn't measured

If nobody defined what success looks like, nobody knows if you achieved it.

  • How many leads per month constitutes success?
  • What conversion rate is acceptable?
  • How much traffic growth is expected?
  • When should you evaluate and adjust?

Without metrics, "working" means "exists" rather than "performs."

Recovery Options

An underperforming website isn't necessarily a lost investment. Recovery paths exist.

Option 1: Strategic remediation

Keep the design; fix the substance.

When it works:

  • Design and technology are solid
  • Problems are primarily content and conversion strategy
  • Site structure is fundamentally sound
  • You're willing to invest in content properly

What it involves:

  • Conversion audit to identify specific problems
  • Content strategy and rewriting for key pages
  • Clear calls-to-action throughout
  • Basic SEO improvements
  • Analytics to track improvement

Investment: $8,000-25,000 for focused remediation

Option 2: Partial rebuild

Keep what works; rebuild what doesn't.

When it works:

  • Some pages or sections perform; others don't
  • Technology is appropriate but underutilised
  • Design needs refinement, not replacement
  • Clear understanding now of what success requires

What it involves:

  • Audit to identify performing vs underperforming elements
  • Redesign/rewrite of problem areas
  • Enhanced conversion paths
  • Proper SEO implementation
  • Ongoing measurement and iteration

Investment: $15,000-50,000 depending on scope

Option 3: Complete rebuild

Start fresh with lessons learned.

When it works:

  • Fundamental problems with technology or structure
  • Business has changed significantly since launch
  • Current site can't support actual needs
  • Budget exists for proper investment

What it involves:

  • Strategy-first approach (not design-first)
  • Content strategy before design
  • Conversion focus throughout
  • Proper SEO foundation
  • Ongoing optimisation built in

Investment: $25,000-80,000 for quality rebuild with content

Avoiding the Same Mistakes

If you're considering fixing or rebuilding, don't repeat the engagement errors:

Define success upfront

Before discussing design or features:

  • What specific outcomes does this website need to produce?
  • How will we measure those outcomes?
  • What happens if we don't hit targets?

Own your content

Content isn't optional filler. It's the core of your website.

  • Budget for professional copywriting
  • Invest time in providing input and feedback
  • Don't accept "lorem ipsum" in proofs
  • Review content as carefully as design

Choose partners on fit, not just portfolio

A beautiful portfolio doesn't mean they'll deliver for you:

  • Do they ask about your business before showing designs?
  • Do they talk about conversion, or just aesthetics?
  • Do they have experience in your industry or business model?
  • What's their process for content and strategy?

Plan for iteration

Websites aren't done at launch:

  • Build in budget for post-launch optimisation
  • Establish analytics and regular review
  • Expect to make changes based on data
  • Treat launch as beginning, not end

Sydney & Melbourne Market Context

Australian businesses face specific dynamics:

Local competition is real

Your competitors—other Sydney or Melbourne businesses—are investing in their websites. If yours underperforms while theirs improves, you're falling behind in a market where prospects research before calling.

Agency market is variable

Sydney and Melbourne have many web agencies, from sole operators to large studios. Quality varies significantly. Credentials don't guarantee outcomes.

Talent is available

Good web developers, copywriters, and strategists exist in Australia. The challenge is structuring engagements that use them effectively, not just hiring any agency that looks professional.


Stuck with an agency website that isn't delivering? Book a call with our team. We'll assess what's actually wrong and whether remediation, rebuild, or something else makes sense for your situation. Honest advice—even if that means your current site just needs content work, not our services.

Travis Sansome

Founder of Artigence. Helping businesses build better technology and unlock value from their data.

Connect on LinkedIn →

Related Articles

How to Validate Your Software Idea Before Building

How to Validate Your Software Idea Before Building

Most software projects fail because they solve the wrong problem. Here's how to validate your idea before spending a dollar on development.

10 min read
The Quote Was Cheap. The Project Wasn't.

The Quote Was Cheap. The Project Wasn't.

That surprisingly low development quote felt like a win—until the invoices started piling up. Here's why cheap software projects cost more in the end.

8 min read
Build vs Buy: When SaaS Costs More

Build vs Buy: When SaaS Costs More

SaaS seems cheaper until you add up the real costs. Here's how to evaluate build vs buy decisions—and when custom wins.

9 min read

Let's Work Together

Need help with your technology strategy, data infrastructure, or product development? We're here to help.